We take a bottom-line approach to each project. Our clients consistently, enhanced brand loyalty and new leads thanks to our work.
Port |
Volume 2021 (Million TEU) |
Volume 2020 (Million TEU) |
Volume 2019 (Million TEU) |
Volume 2018 (Million TEU) |
Volume 2017 (Million TEU) |
Website |
||
1 |
Shanghai, China |
47.03 |
43.5 |
43.30 |
42.01 |
40.23 |
||
2 |
Singapore |
37.49 |
36.6 |
37.20 |
36.6 |
33.67 |
||
3 |
Ningbo-Zhoushan, China |
31.07 |
28.72 |
27.49 |
26.35 |
24.61 |
||
4 |
Shenzhen, China |
28.77 |
26.55 |
25.77 |
27.74 |
25.21 |
||
5 |
Guangzhou Harbor, China |
24.18 |
23.19 |
23.23 |
21.87 |
20.37 |
||
6 |
Busan, South Korea |
22.71 |
21.59 |
21.99 |
21.66 |
20.49 |
||
7 |
Qingdao, China |
23.71 |
22.00 |
21.01 |
18.26 |
18.3 |
||
8 |
Hong Kong, S.A.R, China |
17.8 |
17.95 |
18.30 |
19.6 |
20.76 |
||
9 |
Tianjin, China |
20.27 |
18.35 |
17.30 |
16 |
15.07 |
||
10 |
Rotterdam, The Netherlands |
15.3 |
14.35 |
14.82 |
14.51 |
13.73 |
||
11 |
Jebel Ali, Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
13.74 |
13.5 |
14.11 |
14.95 |
15.37 |
||
12 |
Port Klang, Malaysia |
13.72 |
13.24 |
13.58 |
12.32 |
13.73 |
||
13 |
Xiamen, China |
12.05 |
11.41 |
11.12 |
10 |
10.38 |
||
14 |
Antwerp, Belgium |
12.02 |
12.04 |
11.10 |
11.1 |
10.45 |
||
15 |
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China |
9.86 |
9.62 |
10.42 |
10.45 |
10.27 |
||
16 |
Dalian, China |
3.67 |
6.54 |
10.21 |
9.77 |
9.7 |
||
17* |
Los Angeles, U.S.A |
10.68 |
9.2 |
9.30 |
9.46 |
9.43 |
||
18* |
Hamburg, Germany |
8.72 |
8.7 |
9.30 |
8.73 |
8.86 |
||
19 |
Tanjung Pelepas, Malaysia |
11.2 |
9.85 |
9.10 |
8.96 |
8.38 |
||
20 |
Laem Chabang, Thailand |
8.34 |
7.55 |
8.10 |
8.07 |
7.78 |
||
21 |
Keihin Ports, Japan* |
|
8.00 |
7.98 |
||||
22 |
Long Beach, U.S.A. |
9.38 |
8.11 |
7.63 |
8.09 |
7.54 |
||
23 |
Tanjung Priok, Jakarta, Indonesia |
6.85 |
6.17 |
7.6, 6.81** |
7.64 |
6.09 |
||
24 |
New York-New Jersey, U.S.A. |
9.0 |
7.59 |
7.40 |
7.2 |
6.71 |
||
25 |
Colombo, Sri Lanka |
7.3 |
6.85 |
7.23 |
7.05 |
6.21 |
||
26 |
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam |
8.0 |
7.20 |
7.22 |
6.33 |
6.16 |
||
27 |
Suzhou, China |
8.11 |
6.27 |
|||||
28 |
Piraeus, Greece |
5.31 |
5.44 |
5.67 |
4.91 |
4.15 |
||
29 |
Yingkou, China |
5.21 |
5.67 |
5.48 |
6.5 |
6.28 |
||
30 |
Valencia, Spain |
5.6 |
5.43 |
5.44 |
||||
31 |
Manila, Philippines |
4.98 |
4.43 |
5.31 |
5.05 |
4.82 |
||
32 |
Taicang, China |
7.04 |
5.15 |
|||||
33 |
Hai Phong, Vietnam |
5.7 |
5.13, 4.94** |
|||||
34 |
Algeciras, Spain |
4.8 |
5.11 |
5.12 |
4.77 |
4.39 |
||
35 |
Jawarharlal Nehru Port (Nhava Sheva), India |
5.63 |
4.68 |
5.03 |
5.05 |
4.83 |
||
36 |
Bremen/Bremerhaven, Germany |
5.02 |
4.87 |
5.42 |
5.51 |
|||
37 |
Tanger Med, Morocco |
7.17 |
5.77 |
4.8 |
3.47 |
3.31 |
||
38 |
Lianyungang, China |
5.09 |
4.78 |
4.75 |
4.72 |
|||
39 |
Mundra, India |
6.66 |
4.73 |
4.44 |
4.24 |
|||
40 |
Savannah, U.S.A |
5.61 |
4.68 |
4.59 |
4.35 |
4.05 |
||
41 |
Tokyo, Japan |
4.33 |
4.51 |
4.57 |
4.5 |
|||
42 |
Rizhao, China |
5.17 |
4.86 |
4.50 |
4 |
3.24 |
||
43 |
Foshan, China |
3.71 |
4.44 |
|||||
44 |
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia |
4.88 |
4.43 |
4.12 |
4.15 |
|||
45 |
Colon, Panama |
4.92 |
4.43 |
4.38 |
3.89 |
3.89 |
||
46 |
Santos, Brazil |
4.83 |
4.17 |
4.12 |
3.85 |
|||
47 |
Salalah, Oman |
4.51 |
4.11 |
3.39 |
3.94 |
|||
48 |
Dongguan, China |
3.4 |
4.00 |
3.5 |
3.91 |
|||
49 |
Guangxi Beibu, China |
6.01 |
3.82 |
|||||
50 |
Cai Mep, Vietnam |
5.39 |
4.41 |
|||||
51 |
Yingkou, China |
5.21 |
5.65 |
|||||
52 |
Port Said, Egypt |
4.76 |
4.01 |
|||||
53 |
Qinzhou, China |
4.63 |
3.95 |
|||||
54 |
NW Seaport Alliance, U.S.A. |
3.74 |
3.32 |
|||||
55 |
Felixstowe, U.K. |
3.7 |
3.5 |
|||||
56 |
Marsaxlokk, Malta |
2.97 |
2.44 |
|||||
57 |
Nanjing, China |
3.11 |
3.02 |
|||||
58 |
Fuzhou, China |
3.29 |
3.52 |
|||||
59 |
Barcelona, Spain |
3.53 |
2.96 |
|||||
60 |
Vancouver, Canada |
3.68 |
3.47 |
|||||
*= tie |
||||||||
**= discrepancy of sources |